Anna and his flock and why I don't support them
The Janlokpal Bill is the one that is being debated. It envisages a body (called the Lokpal) which would try and judge cases related to corruption et al. My issues with this are: 1. We have a judicial system in place, bringing that under the Lokpal ambit would make the Lokpal too powerful without checks. There is no guarantee that the Lokpal will be above corruption, is there? If the judicial system is not under the ambit of Lokpal, then we are lengthening the already long judicial process. Any pronouncements by the Lokpal would be challenged in the courts. This would be just a waste of money in setting up and continuing with a Lokpal body. 2. In any democracy, the investigative body and the judicial body have to be separate. As an example, I mean, the police can investigate but not pronounce judgement. The Lokpal does not have this important seclusion of the two. So they would be the people investigating and the same ones passing judgement even though fundamentally they would be d...